JFK “OVER MY DEAD BODY”
November 22, 1963
President John F. Kennedy died in Dallas Texas at 2 PM EST
BEWARE
A NEW age OF ENLIGHTENMENT is
deceptively leading us astray
A PANDEMONIUM TRINITY OF NATIONS NOW control THE ULTIMATE military POWER IN OUR PRESENTDAY WORLD.
THEY CONSIDER THEMSELVES AS THE MASTERS AND RULERS OF THE ENTIRE WORLD
MASS MURDER BY OUR OWN elected governments
Every day somewhere in the world innocent men,women,and children are killed with our vindication and silent approval
HOW WARS START
Senator Lindsay Graham
War is a “terrible thing,” said Sen. Lindsay Graham, Republican from South Carolina, but “sometimes it is better to go to war than to allow the Holocaust to develop a second time.”
Graham then describes the war we Americans should fight:
“If military force is ever employed, it should be done in a decisive fashion. The Iranian government’s ability to wage conventional war against its neighbors and our troops in the region should not exist. They should not have one plane that can fly or one ship that can float.”
WHO STARTS IT, AND HOW IT ENDS.”
As to who starts it, we know the answer. Teheran has not started a war in memory and is not going to launch a suicide attack on a superpower with thousands of nuclear weapons. As with Iraq in 2003, the war will be launched by the United States against a nation that did not attack us — to strip it of weapons it does not have. Senator Graham: “if we are going to start this war, prudence dictates that we destroy Iran’s ability to fight back. At a minimum, we would have to use airstrikes and cruise missiles to hit a range of targets”
A veteran senator says the US should not be satisfied with stopping Iran's nuclear program but should also destroy its military capabilities and deliver a major blow to the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps.
Influential Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, known for his radical militaristic views and support for the Israeli regime said, "My view of military force would be not to just neutralize their nuclear program, which are probably dispersed and hardened, but to sink their navy, destroy their
air force and deliver a decisive blow to the Revolutionary Guard. In other words, neuter that regime,"
Graham sits in two major Senate committees of Armed Services and Homeland Security.
He also complained that the current US-sponsored anti-Iran sanctions are not “crippling.”
In a recent speech before a conservative U.S. think tank, the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Graham called for a direct US military intervention in Iran, insisting that it should not involve ground troops but should be launched by US warplanes and ships.
Meanwhile, top Iranian leaders and military commanders have repeatedly counteracted U.S. and Israeli threats of military actions against the Islamic Republic, insisting that in case the U.S. engages in such an adventure, the repercussions will be severe and wide-ranging.
Iran has conducted numerous sea and air military exercises in the past year, showing off the capabilities of its new anti-ship and anti-air weaponry
SENATORS ON A RECENT TRIP TO ISRAEL
Senator Graham is supported in these judgments by Senators Joe Lieberman, Connecticut, Saxby Chambliss Republican of Georgia, and John McCain, Republican of Arizona.
THE REAL REASONS THESE SENATORS ARE THE CHEER LEADERS FOR A MILITARY ATTACK ON IRAN ARE NOT PRIMARILY FOR THE ATOMIC REASONS THEY PROCLAIM IT TO BE BUT RATHER AS A STRONG REACTION TO THE SPEECHES OF THE IRANIAN PRESIDENT AT THE ANNUAL UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. AT THE PODIUM HE HAS STRONGLY SUGGESTED THAT THE WORLD WAR TWO “HOLOCAUST” WAS A CREATION OF ZIONISTS AND THAT THE 9/11 ATTACK ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTRE WAS NOT A TERRORIST ATTACK BUT WAS AN “INSIDE JOB”CREATED BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT THE ACTIONS OF ISRAEL IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
UNITED NATIONS – The U.S. delegation walked out of the U.N. speech of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday after he said some in the world have speculated that Americans were behind the Sept. 11 terror attacks, staged in an attempt to assure Israel's survival. He did not explain the logic of that statement that was made as he attacked the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Ahmadinejad has called for the destruction of Israel and is deeply at odds with the United States and European allies over its nuclear program and suspicions that it is designed to produce an atomic bomb. Iran says it is only working on technology for electricity generation.
DEMOCRACY - A CIVIL RIGHT OR A POLITICAL VEIL
Today the sad realization for millions of people around the world is the brutal fact that
thousands of young innocent men, women and children are dying daily as martyrs in today’s “War On Terrorism.”
This scandalous reality is being played out graphically twenty-four hours a day on television networks around the world and is sure to leave a long lasting impression of horror and fear in the hearts and minds of both the young and the old of the world. A multitude of reasons are officially “spoken of “ by military and governmental officials in their effort to justify the invasion of Iraq by the American Government - oil, hidden nuclear and chemical weapons, inept and faulty intelligence, democracy, freedom, liberty, etc. These and other nebulous reasons have nothing to do with America’s unilateral decision to bomb, invade and occupy Iraq. The rational for this and other recent military interventions was born in post war 1945 when the total victory of the Allied Military Forces in Europe and Asia provided the basis needed for the birth and establishment of an terrible order of International Political Domination who planned to introduce new policies of political, economic and social programs on the world. They learned the various skills of political deception and fabrication required for the creation of an unnecessary but nevertheless desired war from their political progenitor’s bitter brew of
propaganda used in the 1930s in order create a believable list of reasons and justifications for their military carnage in the Second World War.
They do all this with the consent and the approval of their very own citizens by the means of our modern process of periodic public democratic elections: the dynamics of which they fully understand and have learned to control. This “popular” vote is often only a prelude to a complete and “numerically mandated” dictatorship by the executive branch of a modern democratic government. The early noble Greek philosophical idea of a Democracy often ends as soon as the last ballot is counted.
An ever increasing tempo of “State Sponsored Terrorism” is a modern day problem of
immense proportions that has a profound social and cultural effect in every corner of our
planet. Recent years have become a labyrinth of fire and brimstone suffering for those people unlucky enough to stand in the path of the military fireworks of predatory nations intent on the fulfillment of their programs of domination in order to establish new political, social, and economic arrangements for the nations of the world.. It is not important how many innocent people have to die: who will remember those tens of thousands of unidentified martyrs who must suffer an early death as a result of these policies four years from now when free and democratic elections are held once again?
The author’s 2002 essay that follows is largely based on his own observations and conclusions as to the events and international actions which have left their mark on the world he has lived in, but these worldwide themes themselves and their histories are universal and vitally important to all humanity.
THE AUDACITY, FEROCITY AND
PERSISTENCE OF STATE TERRORISM
Our modern-day world has seen the murderous assassinations and mutilations of the Israeli attack on Palestinian leaders and citizens in the past few years and now some see it as being comparable to the savagery and bestiality of a pride of lions on the hunt. Instead of nourishment, as befitting an animal’s hunt, this insatiable State appetite is one of domination and power. While this killing rampage continues daily, the neutral nations of the world stand aside watching the victim being torn apart. The herd neither attacks their attackers nor do they use their collective strength as a herd and rush in to offer
protection to their young, their weak, and their old. They stand by mesmerized, mute and dumb to the idea of death until the killing is done and the limp carcass is carried away and then return to their grazing once again.
Neighboring States, and a host of others, choose to remain uninvolved and let the savagery play itself out, knowing that at any given moment in time it may be their turn to be socially and economically savaged and face death and the utter destruction of their homeland. For the moment national life is too good and too comfortable to take sides.
en
What afflicts humanity today is certainly not compatible with human dignity; the Almighty has not created human beings so that they could transgress against others and oppress them. By causing war and conflict, some are fast expanding their domination, accumulating greater wealth and usurping all the resources, while others endure the resulting poverty, suffering and misery. Some seek to rule the world relying on weapons and threats, while others live in perpetual insecurity and danger.
Some occupy the homeland of others, thousands of kilometers away from their borders,
interfere in their affairs and control their oil and other resources and strategic routes, while others are bombarded daily in their own homes; their children murdered in the streets and alleys of their own country and their homes reduced to rubble. Such behavior is not worthy of human beings and runs counter to the truth, to justice and to human dignity. The fundamental question is that under such conditions, where should the oppressed seek justice? Who, or what organization defends the rights of the oppressed, and suppresses acts of aggression and oppression? Where is the seat of global justice?
A
OCCUPATION OF COUNTRIES
AND
EXASPERATION OF HOSTILITIES
Military Occupation of countries, including Iraq, has continued for the last three years. Not a day goes by without hundreds of people getting killed in cold blood. The occupiers are incapable of establishing security in Iraq. Despite the establishment of the lawful Government and National Assembly of Iraq, there are covert and overt efforts to heighten insecurity, magnify and aggravate differences within Iraqi society, and instigate civil strife. There is no indication that the occupiers have the necessary political will to eliminate the sources of instability. Numerous terrorists were apprehended by the Government of Iraq, only to be let loose under various pretexts by the occupiers. It seems that intensification of hostilities and terrorism serves as a pretext for the continued presence of foreign forces in Iraq.
Where can the people of Iraq seek refuge, and from whom should the Government of Iraq seek justice? Who can ensure Iraq’s security? Insecurity in Iraq affects the entire region. Can the Security Council
play a role in restoring peace and security in Iraq, while the occupiers are themselves permanent members of the Council? Can the Security Council adopt a fair decision in this regard?
CONSIDER THE SITUATION IN PALESTINE:
The roots of the Palestinian problem go back to the Second World War. Under the pretext of protecting some of the survivors of that War, the land of Palestine was occupied through war, aggression and the displacement of millions of its inhabitants; it was placed under the control of some of the war survivors, bringing even larger population groups from elsewhere in the world. Israel was established in the territory of others with a population collected from across the world at the expense of driving millions of the rightful inhabitants of the land into a diaspora and homelessness. This is a great tragedy with hardly a precedent in history. Refugees continue to live in temporary refugee camps, and many have died still hoping to one day return to their land. Can any logic, law or legal reasoning justify this tragedy? Can any member of the United Nations accept such a tragedy occurring in their own homeland? The pretexts for the creation of the regime occupying s Al-Sharif are so weak that its proponents want to silence any voice trying to merely speak about them, as they are concerned that shedding light on the facts would undermine the raison d’être of this regime, as it has. The tragedy does not end with the establishment of a regime in the territory of others. Regrettably, from its inception, that regime has been a constant source of threat and insecurity in the Middle East region, waging war and spilling blood and impeding the progress of regional countries, and has also been used by some powers as an instrument of division, coercion, and pressure on the people of the region. Reference to these historical realities may cause some disquiet among supporters of this regime. But these are sheer facts and not myth. History has unfolded before our eyes.
Worst yet, is the blanket and unwarranted support provided to this regime. Just watch what is happening in the Palestinian land. People are being bombarded in their own homes and their children murdered in their own streets and alleys. But no authority, not even the Security Council, can afford them any support or protection. Why?
At the same time, a Government is formed democratically and through the free choice of the electorate in a part of the Palestinian territory. But instead of receiving the support of the so called champions of democracy, its Ministers and Members of Parliament are illegally abducted and incarcerated in full view of the international community.
Which council or international organization stands up to protect this brutally besieged Government?
Lebanon
For thirty-three long days, the Lebanese lived under the barrage of fire and bombs and close to 1.5 million of them were displaced; meanwhile some members of the Security Council practically chose a path that provided ample opportunity for the aggressor to achieve its objectives militarily. We witnessed that the Security Council of the United Nations was practically incapacitated by certain powers to even call for a ceasefire. The Security Council sat idly by for so many days, witnessing the cruel scenes of atrocities against the Lebanese while tragedies such as Qana were persistently repeated.
UN SECURITY COUNCIL
In all these cases, the answer is self-evident. When the power behind the hostilities is itself a permanent member of the Security Council, how then can this Council fulfill its responsibilities? The abuse of the Security Council, as an instrument of threat and coercion, is indeed a source of grave concern. Some permanent members of the Security Council, even when they are themselves parties to international disputes,conveniently threaten others with the Security Council and declare, even before any decision by the Council, the condemnation of their opponents by the Council. The question is: what can justify such exploitation of the Security Council, and doesn’t it erode the credibility and effectiveness of the Council? Can such behavior contribute to the ability of the Council to maintain security?
If Middle East conflicts continue as they exist today, they will inevitably worsen and that entire
region will become another 1939 Europe — a ready flashpoint of international political duplicity,
ready to ignite and cause a major worldwide conflagration, once again.
A review of the preceding historical realities would lead to the conclusion that regrettably, justice has become a victim of force and aggression. Many global arrangements have become unjust, discriminatory and irresponsible as a result of undue pressure from some of the powerful. Threats with nuclear weapons and other instruments of war by some powers have taken the place of respect for the rights of nations and the maintenance and promotion of peace and tranquility.
For some powers, claims of promotion of human rights and democracy can only last as long as they can
be used as instruments of pressure and intimidation against other nations. But when it comes to the interests of the claimants, concepts such as democracy, the right of self-determination of nations, respect for the rights and intelligence of peoples, international law and justice have no place or value. This is blatantly manifested in the way the elected Government of the Palestinian people is treated as well as in the support extended to the Zionist regime. It does not matter if people are murdered in Palestine, turned into refugees, captured, imprisoned or besieged; that must not violate human rights. Nations are not equal in exercising their rights recognized by international law. Enjoying these rights is dependent on the whim of certain major powers.
Apparently the Security Council can only be used to ensure the security and the rights of some big powers. But when the oppressed are decimated under bombardment, the Security Council must remain aloof and not even call for a ceasefire. Is this not a tragedy of historic proportions for the Security Council, which is charged with maintaining the security of countries? The prevailing order of contemporary global interactions is such that certain powers equate themselves with the international community, and consider their decisions superseding that of over 180 countries. They consider themselves the masters and rulers of the entire world and other nations as only second class in the world order.
THE MOST SENIOR MEMBER OF THIS TRIO OF NATIONS IS GREAT BRITAIN
The various governments of Great Britain by self assumed Imperial powers have given the world a four hundred year history of conquering, colonizing, creating, dissolving and altering countries in Asia, Europe, Australia, North America, the Middle East, Africa, the Caribbean, and as far east as The International Date line. They have been a busy lot — intrusive, but very busy! This nation remodeling responsibility was passed on to their American cousins in 1945. The British are now resting and reaping their financial and hegemonic rewards. The harvest is substantial, indeed!
Africa was a vast virginal repository of potential fabulous fortunes that could be quickly and
easily made in the gold, diamonds, ivory and slave trades. It is easy to see why Victorian England
was so ready to expand its empire into this mysterious and resource rich continent. England’s
African presence was significantly increased at the end of the First World War with its
confiscation of defeated Germany’s African colonies.
In 1749 the British established the Canadian city of Halifax in Mi’kmaq territory without consulting with the aboriginal tribal leaders. The native people of the Segepenegatig district seeing this foreign incursion into their ancestral domain asked themselves “where can we go if we are deprived of our lands?” In order to save their sacred land they copied a European custom by declaring war on the British colonists. The British were quick to label the native people as rebels. Governor Edward Cornwallis ordered his army to “take and destroy the Savages commonly called Mic-macks, wherever they are found.” He ordered a bounty payment for native scalps at ever escalating rates, with no questions asked.” Three hundred years later we find a similar method of land takeover in the Middle East. Instead of human scalps, flag draped coffins are now the price to be paid for illegal land confiscation. The technology for killing innocents has improved greatly!
Descendants of African Slave Trade
It is impossible to discover from the records of history the number of human lives that were lost in the four hundred year reign of domination that England and the British Empire had in Asia, Europe, Africa, North America, South America, the Caribbean, the Middle East, South East Asia, and in the Pacific. Entire nations and their peoples were enslaved and colonized — in every case against their will..
Millions of Africans were captured, chained and shipped to far off foreign lands and cultures. How many died on the way will never be known. Those that survived were and remain strangers in a foreign land
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THE SECOND AND MOST IMPORTANT NATION OF THE TRIO
At present the Americans are bombing the hell out of the remote and sparsely populated Asian
country of Afghanistan. Canada and several European Nations are obligingly assisting the United
States of America with troops and equipment in this American led Reprisal Campaign termed War
On Terrorism — their participation in these war efforts which do not directly concern them, has
a far from subtle goal of being favorably listed as a friend of Washington. The United States has
and wants only two fraternal friends who have the proper political organizations and global
ambitions and programs to which Washington can pledge allegiance. England and Israel are these
two comrades in arms
The United States has a recent fifty year record of coercing, bombing and invading the
governments and peoples of Korea (1950-53), Guatemala (1954), Vietnam (1964-75), Libya
(1986), Iraq (1991- present), Granada (1983), Nicaragua (1982-1990), Panama (1989), Cuba
(1961-present), Dominican Republic ( 1965), Serbia (1994), Haiti (1915-1934). AFGANISTAN (PRESENTLY)
Not exactly a roster of heavyweights or military giants. Their unauthorized and unsanctioned military
movements in these countries have gone on while the rest of the world sleeps. Even the United
Nations of states for international peace, security, and cooperation established in 1945, the year
that gave the world the new concept of Nuclear Warfare with the explosion of Atomic Bombs over
the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, has stood aside during these American military
escapades and were no where to be found when those victimized nations looked to someone for
help. The United States is the United Nations. Everything else is theater for the poor!
THE THIRD AND MOST DANGEROUS NATION IS ISRAEL
BIRTH OF MIDDLE EAST VIOLENCE
The elaborate and highly secretive preparations which went into the Zionist plan of forming and
creating a State of Israel, located in what was then Palestine, became a reality on November 2,
1917, when Lord James Arthur Balfour stood before the British Parliament and announced that
he had sent a letter to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild, Chairman of The Zionist Federation,
informing Lord Rothschild that his cabinet and His Majesty’s Government “ view with favor the
establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best
endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it clearly being understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish
communities in Palestine, ...”
Lord Balfour’s,now famous letter, became the first significant statement of political approval
and recognition of Zionist ambitions by a major International Nation. It predated the Treaty of
Versailles and the formation of the League of Nations by two years, the Second World War and
its ensuing Holocaust by 22 years. The idea of an Israel was bigger, in many respects, than any
other international event since the lunacy of the 1914-1918 Great War. Sir Winston Churchill then
a member of that 1917 Parliament played his now familiar factotum role. He was later quoted as
saying “ I am a Zionist, let me make that clear. I was one of the original ones after the Balfour
Declaration and I have worked faithfully for it.”
In April of 1920 at San Remo, Italy, Britain was conveniently and expediently given, by The
League of Nations, a political and administrative Mandate to govern Palestine, the Transjordan,
and Iraq regions of the Middle East. The League’s authorization document read: His Britannic
Majesty as the Administrator for Palestine. ”Very cavalier language.”
Since the establishment of Israel in 1948, when the war weary world was looking hopefully for a
new period of peace and prosperity, the world has been transformed into an armed camp and now
has the potential of becoming a worldwide police state. Every inch of ground and every mile of
sky is now a high security zone, patrolled by combat prepared armed military and paramilitary
personnel, and civil and private police forces. Technology has provided a post modern highly
secret and elaborate billion dollar worldwide computer intelligence gathering program that listens
every hour of every day to everyone’s everyday conversations and sees into the private
correspondence between individuals reaching into every corner of the earth. The nation’s most
important public issues are now held to be “most secret” while the most private intimate personal
issues are now “illuminated and broadcast” for the entire nation to see and read. Lethal security
measures are now highly visible at public buildings, airports, border crossings, city centers,
synagogues, embassies, government properties, even to the playing fields of the country.. Nothing
and nobody is now considered to be absolutely safe and secure. This regime of anti-terrorism
security has over-powered the average citizen and has taken away what was formerly considered
to be their public free world where innocent men and women with their families felt free to live,
laugh, and struggle for happiness. That joy is now disappearing from view.
Meanwhile, here at home in North America, our broadcast airways and newspapers are filled with
a torrent of lies and subterfuge carefully planted by a phalanx of selected apologists and hired
hands and voices especially trained and strategically located for their evasive purposes. A throng
of compliant commentators have targeted and invaded our daily media outlets. Their constant
drumming of words and imagery is designed to drown out any dissenting voice and plunge the
debate into a grinding harangue of augmentative discord. Organized media debates are turned into
a shouting match when the truth of the matter is not wanted or found to be unsettling. These
wiseacres do not allow any insightful discussion of the terms and conditions set out in 1948
regarding the matter of financial compensation owed to the Palestinian people for their land and
their property that the State of Israel claimed and took as being their own — or for the need for
fifty years of Palestinian refugee camps which were unheard of before 1948 when millions of
Palestinians lost their land and their housing and were forced to make a life in these makeshift
communities of sorrow, hate and suffering. These liege men, armed with their faux credentials,
have poisoned the milk of human intelligence and decency. This theater of infamy has been with
us now for over forty years and has caused a great deal of harm to the normality of the human
race.* People are turned-off by these pretenses and are less inclined to believe in anything or
anyone anymore. They no longer believe in those things their parents believe or believed in and
lived and died for. To many it has all been a sham, an illusion, a show, a hoax perpetrated by
unseen and unheard social, economic, and political schemers and deceivers. Israel was conceived
and designed and given life in Great Britain thirty years before its actual birth as the State of
Israel of (Mediant Israel). It became the fourth and most recent conceptually designed country on the face of the earth.
RELIGIOUS JEWS IN DANGER
Religious Jews of the world may have unwillingly and unwittingly created for themselves and for future generations of their children another unthinkable holocaust, simply by following the Zionist promises of the establishment of a sanctuary of safety and peace and a geographical national homeland for Jews. This idyllic world was promised by renowned and obscure Zionist leaders. Little did they know that the Zionist’s prime goal was one of control and domination of the land and the peoples living in the Middle East. The Judaic people of the world, have irrevocably turned over their fate and destiny to the Zionists of the world, who are joined in this enterprise, by international Zionists who are neither Jews nor Jewish in culture or religion. Their political and economic goals and ambitions reach much further than creating a National Homeland for Jews. They do not hesitate and are not ashamed to trade their economic and political ambitions on the still warm embers of the world’s most recent holocaust. Instead they make use of this stirring historical account as the very foundation of their cause for existence.
To question Israel’s state policies is immediately translated and labeled as being anti-Semitic, by official Zionist gate keepers. How can it be anti-Semitic when tens of thousands of Jews around the world daily protest and demonstrate against the policies of the Israeli government. Any written or oral statement questioning and criticizing American and British government policies and programs that support the Israeli government is especially seen as being unpatriotic and unwelcome.
Upon closer inspection it will be seen that the State and the Governments of Israel are not Judaic nor does the State follow and believe in and observe the ancient beliefs and practices of Judaic Law. Israel is a secular state. It is a modern Anglo-American- Zionist State given over to a goal of global political influence and economic power and domination. The State of Israel is their beachhead to the entire Middle East.
Benjamin Bleich, an Orthodox rabbi who teaches philosophy at the University of Orthodox Yeshiva University of New York reflects “ritual alone is not the sole determinant of our Judaism, that it must be combined with humanity, with ethical behavior, with proper values and, most important of all, with regard to our relationship with other human beings.”
A much more harmful and devastating by-product of this shameful litany of State manipulation, intrigue, war crimes and duplicity is today’s prevailing systematic growth of corporate, state, institutional and private penchant for the rewards of fraud and corruption. The rot of public corruption abounds in society today, as never before, and gives no indication that it can be contained or eliminated. Political and economic corruption and malfeasance is regarded by those
now in positions of power and influence as a necessary and rewarding tool of the trade. Public discovery and ensuing shame do not dampen the worldwide appetite for the fruits of this malignant code of conduct. Where there is no shame corruption abounds
BBC News June 7, 1981
Israel bombs Baghdad nuclear reactor
BBC NEWS JUNE 7, 198
The Israelis have bombed a French-built nuclear plant near Iraq’s capital,
Baghdad, saying they believed it was designed to make nuclear weapons to
destroy Israel.
It is the world’s first air strike against a nuclear plant.
An undisclosed number of F-15 interceptors and F-16 fighter bombers
destroyed the Osirak reactor 18 miles south of Baghdad, on the order of Prime
Minister Menachem Begin.
The army command said all the Israeli planes returned safely.
The 70-megawatt uranium-powered reactor was near completion but had
not been stocked with nuclear duel so there was no danger of a according to
sources in the French atomic industry.
The Israeli Government explained its reasons for the attack in a statement
saying: “The atomic bombs which that reactor was capable of producing
whether from enriched uranium or from plutonium, would be of the Hiroshima
size. Thus a mortal danger to the people of Israel progressively rose.
It acted now because it believed the reactor would be completed shortly -
either at the beginning of July or the beginning of September 1.
Prime Minister Menachem Begin.
WORDS OF THE AU is on
A CRITICAL PATH SOVEREGNTY PROGRAM FOR THE MIDDLE EAST
A Critical Path Method Program is a process by which a master plan for
the establishment of a Sovereignty Project includes the following
requirements:
1. A list of all activities required to complete the
project .
2. The duration that each activity will take to
completion.
3. The redundancies between countries
The establishment of the First Zionist Congress 1897, the Great War
1914, the Russian Revolution 1917, the Balfour Declaration 1917, the
Treaty of Versailles 1917, the League of Nations 1920, British Mandate
in Palestine 1922, the Great Depression 1929, the Partition of Palestine
1937, the Anschluss 1934, the Spanish Civil War 1936, the Invasion
of Poland by Russia and Germany 1939, the British and French
Declaration war on Germany 1939, the Second World war 1939, Italy
enters the war in Europe 1940, Pearl Harbor 1941, America’s entry in
European war 1941, the Atomic Bombing of Japan 1945, the Holocaust
1945, the Establishment of the United Nations 1945, the Establishment
of Israel 1948, the Persian Gulf War 1991, the Invasion of Iraq 2003.W MODERN WORLD
No War 1939- 1945
No Holocaust
No Israel
Israel's Nuclear Program Being Developed Needed Approval From The U.S.A.
Face to Face May 30, 1961
In late March David Ben-Gurion decided to arrange a meeting with Kennedy. After conquering scheduling problems--including the State Department' s opposition to an official visit--the two leaders agreed to meet privately at New York's Waldorf Astoria Hotel. The meeting was set for May 30, at the end of an official David Ben-Gurion visit to Canada
Kennedy had wanted to portray his informal meeting with David Ben-Gurion as a "spontaneous idea." When plans for the meeting leaked out, it was characterized as an informal encounter made possible by "the coincidence of their presence in New York"- an explanation that was as far from the truth as one could get. The meeting was, after all, the real purpose behind Ben-Gurion's trip to North America. According to his biographer, the Israeli prime minister was "very tense,”fearing that Kennedy's stiff position on the matter of the reactor would severely jeopardize the relationship.
Hundreds of books and words have been written about this meeting and the events that transpired there.
A November 22. 2008 late night talk show caller related the information that he was in that hotel room with Ben-Gurion and JFK, as a presidential aide, not related to the meeting at hand, when he heard harsh and bitter words being traded between Ben-Gurion and John F. Kennedy and heard Ben-Gurion tell the President that Israel would pursue their existing plans for the development of a nuclear weapon program with or without the approval of The United States. The meeting came to an end when the President said defiantly:
“The only way Israel will receive approval for their nuclear programme from USA is over my dead body”
John Fitzgerald Kennedy had a great intellectual and emotional commitment to the cause of nuclear nonproliferation, and he expressed his personal sense of urgency regarding proliferation both in public and private. In February 1960, France had become the fourth member of the nuclear club, and the question Kennedy faced was who would be next. In one of his most memorable speeches, Kennedy described his nuclear nightmare
Kennedy described his nuclear nightmare
"Personally I am haunted by the feeling that by 1970, unless we are successful, there may be ten nuclear powers instead of four, and by 1975, 15 to 20.... I see the possibility in the 1970s of the president of the United States having to face a world in which 15 or 25 nations may have these weapons. I regard this as the greatest possible danger and hazard."(30)
His personal commitment is apparent in the way he dealt with the Israeli nuclear issue after he assumed office on January 20, 1961. Only ten days later, Secretary of State Dean Rusk gave the president a secret two-page memo on Israel's atomic activities, which noted the "categorical assurances" obtained from Ben-Gurion "that Israel does not have plans for developing atomic weaponry." As to U.S. interests in the Israeli case, the memo defined them as opposition to proliferation in general and a particular concern that, in response to Israeli weapons, the Soviets might station nuclear weapons on Arab soil.
WHO WAS JACK RUBY?
WAS HE THE KEY MAN IN THE UNSOLVED KENNEDY ASSASSINATION.
Oswald was charged with the murders of Kennedy and Officer Tippit later that night. Oswald denied shooting anyone and claimed he was a patsy who was arrested because he had lived in the Soviet Union. Oswald's case never came to trial because two days later, while being escorted to a car for transfer from Dallas Police Headquarters to the Dallas County Jail, he was shot and killed by Dallas nightclub owner Jack Ruby live on American television
Jacob Rubenstein (Jack Ruby), was born in Chicago on 25th March, 1911.He was the owner of a Dallas Strip Bar often frequented by members of the Dallas Police Department.
Whatever he was told to do or planned on his own, by murdering Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby effectively ended forever the opportunity for Oswald to defend himself in court and left a lingering haunting historical question: Who assassinated President John Fitzgerald Kennedy on November 23, 1963 in Dallas,Texas.
The Dallas Police had Oswald in their custody from late afternoon November 23 until early morning the next day November 24 under their interrogation yet no record of what was said and recorded at that time has ever been published.
WHO ARE THE MEMBERS OF THIS deadly group OF POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC HIERARCHIES
Are they the new international order of political hierarchies that have taken captive the executive command structures of our democratically selected political world? Are they those that say one thing in public while planning to reintroduce another completely different set of political, religious, and social disciplines in private, while fallaciously advocating superlative promises of democracy, freedom, liberty and justice to the nations and peoples of the world? If so, they must be a morphogenesis breed of men and ideas from those that we have previously described as secret societies. Only they know who they are and what their plans are for the nations and the peoples of the world; but by necessity they must manifest themselves and their political agendas by their covert use of illegal programs of military, social and political operations around the world.
They have gained total and complete political power by infiltrating and corrupting the noble ideals of the early Greek philosophical concept of Democracy. Their cracking whips and machine guns have become nuclear weapons of mass destruction. They control the entire world’s nuclear military power in our skies, in our oceans, and soon in outer space. They do all this with the consent and the approval of ordinary citizens by way of public democratic elections. People have been programmed into believing that they and they alone have the power to select and elect their governments, when in reality their voting is but a prelude to a mandate of full and complete dictatorship by the executive branch of modern democratic nations. Democracy often ends as soon as the last ballots are counted.
There remains a need to unmask the war criminals who planned and executed the prelude and the final destruction of Europe and the political murder of sixty million* innocent men, women and children in what is now known as World War II.
*Their blood, death, and the destruction of their homes, cities and farms have become the main fertilizing agents in the unprecedented economic expansion manufactured and enjoyed by millions of people in the developed countries of the world.
Europeans knew of the evil that lurked in the origins of Marxism and the menace of the Soviet Communist threat to Europe early in prewar European history. They saw that this threat was not only limited to the Soviet Union, but rather was a threat of a worldwide anesthetization and the very real possibility of a Western European Soviet, not in the form of an armed military takeover, but rather a slow peaceful infiltration of the Western World with he philosophical and political programs of Marxism;a friendly open form of Marxism, posing as fellow comrades with the Christian countries of Europe. A diplomatic Marxism.
SECRET SOCIETIES AND THEIR UNPUBLISHED PLANS FOR MANKIND.
These three political forces, Zionism, Communism, and Freemasonry are ideologies formed early in the twentieth century by Jewish politicians known now as Zionists. Communism, was born in Russia as a
social consequence of the Soviet Russian Revolution of 1917. Freemasonry, and its host of strange bedfellows, has its roots in medieval England and remains as important to the English nobility today as its own Royal Family.
THEIR VICIOUS, DEPLORABLE LIES AND FABRICATIONS MUST BE EXPOSED AND DAMMED FOR THE EVIL THAT THEY DO AND CAUSE TO BE DONE IN EVERY NATION, IN EVERY REGION OF THE WORLD
In a letter dated Toronto, Ontario, February 28, 1953, Marshall McLuhan, Canadian
Communications Theorist wrote to American Poet Ezra Pound :
Dear Pound
Last year has been spent in going through rituals of secret societies with fine comb. As I
said before I'm in a bloody rage at the discovery that the arts and sciences are in the pocket of
these societies.
Now that I know the nature of the sectarian strife among the societies I have no intention
of participating in it any further, until I know a great deal more. To hell with the East and the
West.
KARL MARX
WHO IS KARL MARX AND WHAT IS MARXISMMA
NWHAT IS MARXISM
In 1941 and 1942, under pressure from U.S. President F.D. Roosevelt and others in the
Western Allied camp wanting to soothe any religious objections to the Western Alliance’s military relations with the Soviet Russia, Pope Pius XII was led to believe that acceptance of the Western Alliance’s association with the Soviet Union was the lesser of two evils facing Europe and the Western Christian world at that time. The Pope knew enough about the philosophical creeds of Marxism and National Socialism to make up his own mind, which he did. He looked to the future of Germany and saw two distinct social realities on the horizon: Soviet Communism and National Socialism under the leadership of Adolf Hitler and knew that only one would survive and would take over the immediate political future of Germany.
Pacelli knew that Karl Marx early in his youth had written a composition titled The Union of the Faithful with Christ, in which Marx exalted the social and spiritual Christian brotherly love amongst men and societies.
In the six years that Nuncio Eugenio Pacelli spent in Munich, from 1919 to 1925, he gathered information about this new personage on the scene, Karl Heinrich Marx, German philosopher, economist, and social theorist. He soon learned that much of the gathered information was beginning to frighten him as a man and as a Papal Nuncio. By the time he, Pacelli, was posted to Berlin in 1925 he knew the life and thoughts of Karl Marx in fine detail. Pacelli visited the town where Marx was born and raised, Tier, and visited the University of Bonn where Marx was a student for a year. He had personal interviews with living relatives of Marx and of Jenny von Westphalen, Karl Marx’s wife.
During his stay in Berlin, Cardinal Pacelli read the records of Karl Marx’s studies at the
University of Berlin. He also visited the boarding house where Marx lived while in Berlin and went to Stralau where Marx met regularly with members of the Young Hegelians. Pacelli inspected police records which displayed records of anarchistic activity by the members of the Doktor-Klub of which Marx was a member.
COMMUNISM
THE PRINCIPALS OF MODERN COMMUNISM, A THEORY AND A SYSTEM OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION, WERE STATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE 19TH CENTURY BY KARL MARX, AND FRIEDRICH ENGELS.
The elements of communist theory include radical materialism, inevitable class struggle and conflict and the ultimate establishment of a world-wide classless society, common ownership of productive goods, the subordination of all persons and institutions to the dictatorship of the collective, denial of rights, dignity and liberty of persons, militant atheism and hostility to religion .
Communism in theory and practice has been the subject of many papal documents and statements and has been condemned as early as 1846 by Pius IX, and repeated by Leo XIII in 1878 and in Rerum Novarum in 1891. Pius XI wrote on the same subject in 1931 and 1937.These writings have been up-dated and developed by Pius XII, John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II
CHRISTIANS UNDER ATTACK
Catholic Church In Baghdad Attacked
A man stands near a coffin of a victim from the attack on the Syrian Catholic church of Our Lady of Deliverance on November 1, 2010 in Baghdad, Iraq. Gunmen stormed the church yesterday evening during a Sunday night mass firing and bombing the building while wounding and killing dozens of parishioners held hostage inside. The Death toll from the massacre in the church has risen to at least 52 killed.
Bullet holes scar a stone relief of the Virgin Mary Catholic Church in Baghdad when U.S. And Iraqi forces stormed the church
PALESTINIAN APARTMENT BOMBED
In less than two minutes, the dream of a new life in Toronto was shattered for a Palestinian doctor and his eight children
'What happened, happened. I can't return the lives of my daughters'
The anguish of DR. EZZELDEEN ABU AL-AISH was broadcast live on TV, the Palestinian's pain moving even the Israeli prime minister to tears
The family of Dr. Ezzeldeen Abu al-Aish, a leading Palestinian advocate of peace, had been talking in their Gaza apartment about their impending move to Toronto where their father was to take up a teaching fellowship.
Then, in less than two minutes on Jan. 16, a pair of Israeli tank shells overturned for all time the lives of Abu al-Aish and what remains of his family. "They were the most beautiful girls, the most lovely girls ... "
TWO FORMER
AGES OF ENLIGHTENMENT
THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
1789-1801
Program of dechristianization waged against Catholicism, and eventually against all forms of Christianity, included:
confiscation of church lands, which were to be the security for the new Assignat currency
removal of statues, plates and other iconography from places of worship
destruction of crosses, bells and other external signs of worship
the institution of revolutionary and civic cults, including the Cult of the Supreme Being,
the enactment of a law on October 21, 1793 making all nonjuring priests and all persons who harbored them liable to death on sight.
The climax was reached with the celebration of the Goddess "Reason" in Notre Dame Cathedral on 10 November 1793.
The dechristianization campaign can be seen as the logical extension of the materialist philosophies of some leaders of the enlightenment, while for others with more prosaic concerns it was an opportunity to unleash resentments against the Church and clergy.
THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION
The Great Russian Revolution of 1917, launched by Vladimir Lenin and his Bolshevik party, profoundly influenced the history of the twentieth century. The fall of the Russian Empire and its replacement by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics ushered in а new аgе in world politics. More than this, the Russian Revolution was the triumph of а dynamic revolutionary ideology that directly challenged Western capitalism. But what of the hidden origins of this Revolution? Did secret influences contribute to the victory of Lenin and the Bolsheviks?
A number of social and political movements, including Marxism and Lenin’s Bolshevism, have been linked to Gnosticism, which flourished in the early centuries of the Christian era.
Soviet Power & Spiritual Revolution
Apocalyptic and messianic themes, popularized for centuries by the Russian underground, were played out in the Bolshevik Revolution and fueled the drive to build a classless, communist society. The dream of a communist paradise on earth created by human hands, a new world adorned by technological perfection, social justice and brotherhood, was found both in Marx and in the Russian spiritual agnostic schools of thought.
ARE THESE MEN WAR CRIMINALS THE PAST CE NTURY IN EU ROPE , AFRIC
AMERICA, SOUTH AMERICA, THE
There is now enough public evidence that these men and their governments can now be seen and judged to be the
architects of the political planning and military execution of the second
world war
Winston Churchill, far from being the wise, brave, British Statesman-Saint as he is
now seen to be – was nevertheless a knowledgeable factotum in the affairs of modern Europe. He understood that Britain alone was no military match for the renewed German military might which Britain now faced, as a result of their declaration of war against Germany on September 3, 1939. By this declaration Britain and France put both of their countries at risk and grave danger. The German Army swept through Belgium and France in only two months of early 1940 and completely destroyed the British and French armies gathered there to defend the Western Front of the war.
Churchill’s famous words to the people of England “We have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat” (was a direct translation of a speech given Giuseppe Garibaldi in 1849): “Non offro nè paga, nè quartiere, nè provvigioni. Offro fame, sete, marce forzate, battaglie e morte.“ His speech was pilfered
from the Italian original to advance Churchill’s succinct and forthright war aims.
The great wall of France, the Maginot Line took twenty-one years to build and designed as a protective wall of defense from any advancing armies from the East. It stretched from Switzerland in the North to the Mediterranean in the South. It was a series of underground, ultramodern tunnels of defense which failed in the face of the onslaught of the German Army on which France had the audacity to declare war. The German Army was now only 25 miles away from the British coastline and 90 miles from London. One unexplained and unexplored aspect of the war remains an open question: If England was truly the ultra archenemy in the eyes of the Germans, the German military might could have invaded England and found total victory there within weeks or months. Instead England was seen by the German Command as a tottering old lady whose time had now past after a dubious career of instigating and meddling in the affairs of other nations. The Germans did not attack with its full military might.
If they had it would have meant that the United States would have had to invade England from three thousand miles away in order to overthrow the German occupation of Great Britain. England now was in an immediate need of a military savior. They acquired two in 1941
JOSEPH STALIN – HOW TO RENT
AN ARMY AND BUY AN ALLY
On September 29, 1941, Russia, England and the USA signed a mutual aid agreement in
Moscow when Joseph Stalin, Averell Harriman of the USA and Canadian born Baron William Maxwell Aitken, Lord Beaverbrook, of England concluded a Lend Lease Agreement which guaranteed that Russia could afford to open a second front against Germany in Eastern Europe. At the time Russia’s Soviet Comintern was Western Capitalism’s sworn enemy,committed to an ideology which had a goal to conquer and dissolve the economic and social fabric of the Western Capitalist nations of the world — they had been committed to this economic revolutionary goal since 1917 at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Under the dictatorship of Joseph Stalin, tens of millions of ordinary individuals were executed or imprisoned in labor camps that were little more than death camps. Perceived political orientation was the key variable in these mass atrocities. But gender played an important role, and in many respects the Purge period of Soviet history can be considered the worst gendercide of the twentieth century.
The Second World War Katyn massacre was committed on the direct order of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. 1940 massacre of around 20,000 Polish officers and other prominent citizens occurred after Russia invaded Poland in 1939 and took thousands of its inert military officers and intellectuals into custody. Soviet propaganda for decades blamed the killings on the Nazis, but post-Soviet Russia previously acknowledged they were carried out by the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs. Stalin’s much feared secret police.
President Franklin Roosevelt assured Winston Churchill that he would find a way
to have the United States Government involved in the European War then in progress and on December 7, 1941, with the attack on Pearl Harbor he fulfilled his promise and began a varied agenda of financial, military, and armaments aid programs to the Allied Forces in Europe.
It was a monopoly of the international money markets that united the Allies to plan and
begin another war. Nothing else united the interests the governments of England, USA and Russia combined with a gross indifference and contempt for the lives and properties of other sovereign nations and especially for the welfare of all humanity in general. Military victories in Europe and the Pacific would secure a monopoly that would control of all the gold, currency, debt, usury, and monetary laws and markets of the world.
President Harry Truman authorized use of the atomic bomb on August 3, 1945. On August 6 the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, leveling over sixty percent of the city. Seventy thousand citizens died instantly. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, over twenty thousand people died instantly. Thousands more died after the atomic blasts from radiation exposure.
Their ultimate goal is to create a social and financial Marxist society for all the
nations of the world. The People's Republic of China (1949) is the world's first
Marxist- Leninist- Maoist nation to be enriched intentionally by western capitalist nations thereby creating a symbol of what they desire to establish in a new social, economic, political, cultural, and religious order here on earth and in the skies above!
CURRENCY - A HISTORICAL WEAPONOF MASS DESTRUCTION
Further to the military. police, and political power given to the government by way of
democratic elections, is the absolute and unlimited potential of their taxation and
spending powers of the nation’s currency.
Most, if not all of the world’s private enterprise nations have adopted the policy of
“deficit” financing ever since the end of the Second World War.
MODUS OPERANDI
The world of capitalism is “floating” upon a vast sea of international debt. That is a long
term disastrous losing game they are playing with the nation’s wealth. The ultimate end
to this indebtedness is nowhere in sight: They have lost sight of their financial debt
horizon and their national social and financial responsibilities and as a result have to
reformulate their own domestic financial and social obligations as well as their
national social and financial debt/creditor arrangements with other nations. Therein lies the problem and also the solution
SI
In 1939 it was Sir Winston Churchill, Lord Louis Mountbatten, Sir Anthony Eden, Lord Robert Cecil, and others who made up the war political and propaganda machinery of England. All born as members of the British aristocracy, to a life of privilege and political and military power. Victorian England recognized, as gentlemen, those men and their sons that worked in the service of the country as clergymen belonging to the Church of England, army officers, and members of Parliament. They were aristocratic gentlemen by virtue of their birth and their occupation. They conceived, legislated, administered and directed England’s many war efforts. They were never found in the trenches of war.
Later in the war it became newcomers Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Harry Truman in
America, and in Russia it was Joseph Stalin.
“They All Lie – So Do The Media”
The name of the author of this now famous quotation is not known, but his words are being used and being seen and understood as a prophetic and wise modern standard to be used by the innocents and the wise of the world. These few words seem to encapsulate the essence of our times: living daily with a world of political, social, and economic uncertainties and deceptions, perpetrated and disseminated, by today’s reality of the world of the twin engines of mass propaganda and mass media.
PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT’S CAMPAIGN TO INCITE WAR IN EUROPE
Not so well known is the story of Roosevelt’s enormous responsibility for the outbreak of the Second World War itself. This essay focuses on Roosevelt’s secret campaign to provoke war in Europe prior to the outbreak of hostilities in September 1939. He bears a grave responsibility before history for the outbreak of the most destructive war of all time.
Institute for Historical Review
The Secret Polish Documents
Mark Weber
Ezra Pound
In 1939 Ezra Pound made a trip to Washington, D.C., where he spoke with members of
Congress about his economic policies and about his fear that Roosevelt, the bankers, and the armaments industry were leading America into another war. He began regular broadcasting his ideas over Rome Radio, in a program aimed at the English-speaking world. Mixing reflections on literature with tirades against Roosevelt, usury, and international finance.
The Heath Anthology of American Literature
Houghton Mifflin Ezra Pound 1885-1972
We still ha not been told the e re
w
GORE VIDAL
Gore Vidal points out something that has been long known to us, but never before
admitted, namely that President Roosevelt deliberately provoked the Japanese to
attack Pearl Harbor. They deliberately cut off Japan’s oil supplies, then refused to sell
them scrap metal, and so on. So they attacked. The attack on Pearl Harbor was worth
more to Roosevelt than several divisions…. We still have not been told the reason
why Japan attacked Pearl Harbor! Roosevelt provoked the attack, but the national
mythology requires him to be a saint, so nothing is said about it. The press and the
media are owned and controlled by our ‘corporate masters‘ They control all the flow of
information, so that the great majority of Americans do not know what is going on.
The Decline And Fall Of The American Empire
BBC interview with Gore Vidal with Andrew Marr
Written by Alan Woods TWIN WEAPOF MASS DES TRUC TION
Throughout most of 1942, General Draza Mihailovic enjoyed the unqualified support of the Western Allies. By the end of the year a dramatic switch in policy occurred, with the anti- Communist Mihailovic being cut off from further support. London, Washington, and Moscow were now unanimous in their backing of Tito’s “Red Partisans”.
The Web Of Disinformation: Churchill’s Yugoslav Blunder
David Martin
Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. 1990
THIS IS NOW
Henry Kissinger was the 56th Secretary of State of the United States from 1973 to 1977
The minutes of a secret 1975 meeting of the National Security Council attended by
President Ford reveal Henry Kissinger grumbling, “It is an act of insanity and national
humiliation to have a law prohibiting the President from ordering assassination.
President Nixon & Henry Kissinger
CHILE 1973
President Richard Nixon had determined that Salvador Allende was not to become the head of the Chilean government, for various nefarious reasons, not obviously and directly connected with US national security, if that has any relevance. Kissinger became the high-level action officer focused on accomplishing this mission directive from the President. The most significant obstacle to eliminating Allende was General Schneider. The murder victim is General Rene Schneider, who was the Commander in Chief of the Chilean Army. There exists international arrest warrants from Ireland,France and Spain who wish to charge him with war crimes from he Chile war. The Spanish and French say Henry Kissinger is implicated in the death of French and Spanish in the war in Chile.
Madam April Glaspies, American Ambassador to Iraq:
Meeting with Saddam Hussein
July 25, 1990
“We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait. I was in the American Embassy in Kuwait during the late ‘60s. The instruction we had during this period was that we should express no opinion on this issue and that the issue is not associated with America. James Baker has directed our official spokesmen to emphasize this instruction. We hope you can solve this problem using any suitable methods via Klibi (Chedli Klibi, Secretary General of the Arab League) or via President Mubarak. All that we hope is that these issues are solved quickly.”
OPERATION DESERT STORM
July 1991
George H.W. Bush, National Security Directive 45, US Policy in Response to the Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait, August 20, 1990. Secret.
This NSD was the first of two key Presidential directives that guided US policy and actions in response to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait. The directive articulated US interests in the region and the four principles that would guide US policy during the crisis--including the “immediate, complete, and unconditional withdrawal of all Iraqi forces from Kuwait” and “a commitment to the security and stability of the Persian Gulf.” The directive went on to specify diplomatic, economic, energy, and military measures that the US would take to achieve its objectives.
The evening of Mar ch 21, 2003 e Unit ed Stat es of
In 2003 it is George W. Busch, General Colin Powell, Richard Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, John Snow, Donald H. Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, Tom Ridge, Condolezza Rice, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Jack Straw, Ariel Sharon, et all.
The evening of March 21, 2003, the United States of America unilaterally began a bombing attack on the city and the citizens of Baghdad, Iraq. War against the sovereign Republic of Iraq had begun and an invasion of US military troops and equipment began their war of invasion and occupation. Iraq’s twenty million people would now be in danger of losing their lives as well as losing their country, their homes and their property. Their homeland would never be the same - at best it will become a franchise democracy of the Internationalists of the world.
MAN THROWS SHOES AT PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
“ YOU DOG ”
“You are responsible for thousands of widows and orphans”
A WEB OF FALSEHOODS AND PROPAGANDA
THE SURREPTITOUS REASONS
A new wave of wars may have begun with this midnight attack out of the skies of Iraq.
Today, the gravest danger in the war on terror, the gravest danger facing America and the
world, is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.
These regimes could use such weapons for blackmail, terror, and mass murder… .
President Bush’s State of the Union address, January 29, 2003
----------
The burden is on Iraq to comply and disarm. Inspectors are inspectors, not detectives….
Sadam Hussein and his regime are doing everything they can to make sure the inspectors find absolutely nothing…
We will not shrink from whatever is ahead of us. We must not fail in our duty and our
responsibilities. Clearly, Saddam will stop at nothing until someone stops him.
Colin Powell, briefing to the UN Security Council, 6 February, 2003
He claims to have no chemical or biological weapons, yet we know he continues to hide
biological and chemical weapons, moving them to different locations as often as every 12 to
24 hours, and placing them in residential neighborhoods.
US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, speaking to the press, 12 March, 200
I have the strongest belief that the world must confront the twin evils of the spread of
weapons of mass destruction to rogue states and the danger of those weapons falling into the hands of international terrorists.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard, in a nationally televised address from
parliament, 13 March, 2003Iraq continues to deny that it has any WMD, though no serious intelligence service anywhere in
Prime Minister Tony Blair told the House of Commons that Iraq had Weapons
of mass destruction, and these could be used to attack Britain, in a matter of fifteen minutes.
Mr. Tony Blair, speaking to the House of Commons, 18 March, 2003
-------------
The danger is clear: using chemical, biological, or, one day, nuclear weapons obtained with the help of Iraq, the terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands of hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country or any other… . Today, no nation can possibly claim that Iraq has disarmed. And it will not disarm so long as Saddam Hussein holds power.
President Bush’s ultimatum to Saddam Hussein, 18 March, 2003
---------------
Memos show that Blair planned to participate in the war nearly a year before it began
The Sunday Times newspaper yesterday published leaked cabinet minutes from July, 2002.
They indicated Mr. Blair and his colleagues believed the United States was bent on invading
Iraq and toppling dictator Saddam Hussein, and concluded that such action should be justified
on moral rather than legal ground. This record is extremely sensitive, the document begins,
“No further copies should be made. It should be shown to those with a genuine need to know
its contents.
The Globe and Mail, Monday, May 2, 2005
By Doug Saunders, London
We do not want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.
Condoleeza Rice, National Security Adviser
CNN Late Night Interview
September 8, 2002
Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong. And 100,000 people have paid with their lives -- 1,600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies, 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever for a pack of lies.
British Member of Parliament George Galloway in his testament before a U.S.
Senate panel, Tuesday, May 17, 2005
Why ha one atom
LONDON Election campaigns claim unforeseen casualties and, in Britain’s case, one may be
the ability of leaders to order troops to war at America’s side with quite the same flair and
quite the same sense of Churchillian rectitude as Tony Blair displayed in Iraq. The campaign
for Britain’s election on Thursday has brought a tally of damaging disclosures and challenges
to Blair’s actions before the invasion of Iraq two years ago, provoking forecasts that politicians will face greater constraints in joining a war in the future.
News Analysis: British grow less unflinching on warfare
The New York Times
Alan Cowell
May 4, 2005
As Americans debate what President Clinton’s legacy should be, too little attention is given to
his remarks on Kosovo. The United States launched a war against a European nation largely
at Clinton’s behest. Clinton’s war against Serbia epitomized his pastoralism, his arrogance, his
refusal to respect law, and his fixation on proving his virtue by using deadly force, regardless
of how many innocent people died in the process. Serbia reports 250,000 deaths from attacks
which began March 24, 1999 Clinton claimed on March 24, 1999, that one purpose of bombing Serbia (including Kosovo) was “to deter an even bloodier offensive against innocent civilians in Kosovo and, if necessary, to seriously damage the Serbian military’s capacity to harm the people of Kosovo.” The CIA had warned the Clinton administration that if bombing was initiated, the Serbian army would greatly accelerate its efforts to expel ethnic Albanians. The White House disregarded this warning and feigned surprise when mass expulsions began.
WHY HAS ISRAEL NOT SIGNED THE ATOMIC PROLIFERATION TREATY.
Tel-Aviv - The State of Israel would have “100 to 300 ‘nuclear warheads.” Israel has a atomic bomb power similar to that of Britain. Israel was the sixth nation to acquire nuclear weapons already in the 50s. The experts at Jane’s Defense Weekly, which deals with military information has published this vital information. The Israeli nuclear weapons program has
always been surrounded by the greatest secrecy. Yesterday Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu canceled his trip to Washington for fear of having to answer questions related to nuclear weapons possessed by Israel and because his state is one of the few who has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel is the only nuclear power in the Middle East.
Mordechai Vanunu
Mordechai Vanunuis a former Israeli nuclear technician who, citing his opposition to weapons of mass destruction, revealed details of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the British press in 1986. He has revealed many details about his country’s nuclear program. For this he was arrested and jailed for 18 years and still suffers the limitations of freedom in Israel. In a startling accusation, he has alleged that Israel was behind the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy.
MORE TRAINING NEEDED AFTER CIVILIAEATHS IN
DETROIT NEWS , MONDAY MAY 31, 2010
Washington -- The lives of 194 Michiganders have been lost supporting U.S. offensives in Iraq
and Afghanistan since operations began in the aftermath of the 9/11 terror attacks. On this
Memorial Day, their sacrifices will be remembered in cities and small towns from the Ohio
border to the shores of Lake Superior. Nearly three-quarters of the state’s 83 counties have a
resident who has not returned home after being killed in either war. - 12:02 pm
Photos: Michigan’s Fallen
194 Photos on front page
Remembering the troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan
WHERE IS THE RAGE AND THE ANGER FROM THE FAMILIES THAT HAVE SUFFERED THE LOSS OF A DEAR SON, HUSBAND, FATHER.
IT IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO SAY “HE WAS A HERO AND DIED FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM”
THAT IS A CONVENIENT statement FOR EVERYONE CONCERNED.
Since the U.S.A. Operation Iraq Freedom military invasion began nine years ago 4747 young men have died in Iraq. Since Operation Enduring Peace began in Afghanistan 2239 have died. What a high price in young lives to be buried and forgotten while more wars in the Middle East are being planned today.
THESE CANCEROUS POLITICAL/MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR PLANS FOR THE WORLD MUST BE PERMANENTLY removed FROM OUR SOCIETIES
G20 DEMONSTRATION TORONTO CANADA
JULY 14 2010
London December 14, 2010
England and the United States of America each have a concealed arsenal of atomic and nuclear weapons and mistakenly may now believe that with these weapons of mass destruction they can dominate and control the world. They should be wise enough to know that these weapons of mass destruction are only the penultimate power in the world today — the ultimate power resides with people in the street power. History has shown this to be the case and the future will again show that this people power has no rival. They have toppled great governments, empires and kingdoms in the past and still retain the crowning street power to do it again, and again. Street power comes with a cost of street beatings, arrests and in some cases blood and deaths, as in any war.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
Are the politicians named in this essay guilty of
war crimes against humanity ?
YOU BE THE JUDGE AND JURY
HISTORIANS AND GOVE RNMENTS HAVE SHAPE D THE THE LEADERS OF THE
SEC OND WORLD WAR. BU T ARE THESE BE LIEFS WE HAVE CORREC T?
In both periods of time, both wars, and with both political regimes these reasons were and are merely the facades presented to the world for justification of these wars. The more genuine rationale is that at both times and in both cases these leaders and their money markets needed a war and wanted these wars. So they determined : God we are going to have our war regardless of how many people get killed and how much money it will take and to hell with what the general public thinks or whatever the world’s opinion may be: We want a war and we will start a war when we want. And besides, having a large scale war makes a lot of money.
J’ Accuse
As an observer and an author I feel compelled to make the following proposal: that an oversight committee be appointed to place these charges in an International Criminal Court which would become an International War Crimes Tribunal courtroom for the people of the world to hear and see evidence presented by the prosecution and defense teams appointed by advocates for both parties. The case against the governments and their cabinets of Britain, France, United States of America, the British Commonwealth nations, and others commonly known as the Allied Forces, and the nations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
Presently the world has accepted today’s version of a stream of programs of political media propaganda which has at its core the erroneous story that the present war in the Middle East is a “War On Terrorists” ever since 9/11.This war began the day Israel became a nation in 1948.
ARE THESE MATIONAL
THE UNBRIDLED EXPANSION OF NUCLEAR, CHEMICAL
AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
Some powers proudly announce their production of second and third generations of nuclear weapons. What do they need these weapons for? Is the development and stockpiling of these deadly weapons designed to promote peace and democracy? Or, are these weapons, in fact, instruments of coercion and threat against other peoples and governments? How long should the people of the world live with the nightmare of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons?
What connects these powers producing and possessing these weapons? How can they be held accountable before the international community? And, are the inhabitants of these countries content with the waste of their wealth and resources for the production of such destructive arsenals? Is it not possible to rely on justice, ethics and wisdom instead of these instruments of death? Aren’t wisdom and justice more compatible with peace and tranquility than nuclear, chemical and biological weapons? If wisdom, ethics and justice prevail, then no reason will remain for conflict.
This is a solid proposition because most global conflicts emanate from injustice, and from the powerful, not being contented with their own rights, striving to devour the rights of others.
People across the globe embrace justice and are willing to sacrifice for its sake.
Would it not be easier for global powers to ensure their longevity and win hearts and minds through the championing of real promotion of justice, compassion and peace, than through continuing the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons and the threat of their use?
The experience of the threat and the use of nuclear weapons is before us. Has it achieved anything for the perpetrators other than exacerbation of tension, hatred and animosity
among nations
WAR LORDS AND THEIR MANY WARS
Who are these men who travel to the far ends of the earth to meet in secret rooms and
conceive and execute special and far reaching agendas in concealed documents which
in due course will affect the lives, fortunes and destiny of millions of global citizens their families and their children? Are they Americans? Are they English? Are they Israelis? Are they Europeans?Are they Asians? Regardless of what their passports show and state they are none of the above: They are Internationalists.
Ordinary men in every way as individuals, fathers, sons, husbands, brothers, but once becoming engaged with others in clandestine operations, they sign themselves on as fellow travelers in one
malevolent cause or another that has a goal of territorial invasion, conquest, power and enrichment, much like the former colonization of the aboriginal peoples in North America, Australia and Africa . Then it was known as “Gunboat Diplomacy” Now it is advertised as a just war to bring democracy, liberty and freedom to people living in an ancient land . The existing government is always described
as being backward, exploiters and murderers, and a country and a people that needs and wants our new laws, a new culture, a brighter economy, and modern social norms. Whether they want it or not is not a factor in their invader's mind; they are going to get bombed regardless of whatever national defense they can quickly launch
These men are driving hard and fast to establish a new and extremely powerful International Organization that will control all the riches of the earth and the culture and life style of millions of citizens around the world. What you now own and possess will be taken away from you by political, social and monetary laws and restrictions – that is exactly what Karl Marx and Lenin dreamed of . Make no mistake the economic and cultural model now at work in China will be the goal of the Internationalists.
The one vital factor that stands out in this ostensibly unchristian emerging world is the value and worth of religion to people of all races and status. Religion has a centuries old history of being the whipping boy of anyone who disfavors the church but also has a history of surviving all and any attacks from these agnostic men and their secular programs and ideologies.
In the post-war era of an unceasing proliferation of global, international, and world class organizations and corporations the Roman Catholic Church remains as the only truly worldwide International Organization today and as such is the only roadblock to the total and complete domination of the nations and the peoples of the world by agents of change working on behalf of the Internationalists of the world. Presently the Church has 1.3 billion members in every region of the world. It will have to be dealt with sooner or later in order for their programs and agendas for the world to be fully developed. At the moment both forces are steering towards a collision point which will change the spirituality of nations and societies of the world forever.
WHEN FAITH IS LOST
be on guard
Cincinnatus
Cincinnatus
When a nation, a people, a society, an individual loses sight of their innate spirituality and humanity all is lost and anything and everything is possible and probable,leading some to a false sense of a profane fascination of unjustifiable conquests, murders, wars, and worldwide holocausts.
A coin of Bruttium representing the Dioscuri
announcing the victory at the Battle of Lake Regillus
WH4n od Alexander Pope 1
An Honest Man is the Noblest
Work of God
Alexander Pope
1688-174
RUDOLPH S. DALDIN
Copyright © January 1, 2011 Rudolph S. Daldin
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
In memory of Valentino & Angela Nella Daldin
